Archive
Transcript for “My Child Has Autism: How Do I Get Insurance?” Webchat
On Monday February 27th the Government Relations team hosted their first webchat, “My Child Has Autism: How Do I Get Insurance?” The webchat was hosted by Lorri Unumb, Esq., Vice President for State Government Affairs.
|
7:55
|
|
|
7:56
|
|
|
7:56
|
|
|
7:56
|
|
|
8:02
|
|
|
8:04
|
|
|
8:04
|
|
|
8:04
|
|
|
8:04
|
|
|
8:04
|
|
|
8:05
|
|
|
8:06
|
|
|
8:06
|
|
|
8:06
|
|
|
8:06
|
|
|
8:06
|
|
|
8:06
|
|
|
8:09
|
|
|
8:10
|
|
|
8:10
|
|
|
8:11
|
|
|
8:13
|
|
|
8:13
|
|
|
8:16
|
|
|
8:16
|
|
|
8:18
|
|
|
8:18
|
|
|
8:22
|
|
|
8:22
|
|
|
8:22
|
|
|
8:25
|
|
|
8:25
|
|
|
8:25
|
|
|
8:25
|
|
|
8:26
|
|
|
8:27
|
|
|
8:27
|
|
|
8:28
|
|
|
8:30
|
|
|
8:30
|
|
|
8:30
|
|
|
8:31
|
|
|
8:31
|
|
|
8:32
|
|
|
8:34
|
|
|
8:34
|
|
|
8:34
|
|
|
8:36
|
|
|
8:36
|
|
|
8:36
|
|
|
8:37
|
|
|
8:38
|
|
|
8:38
|
|
|
8:40
|
|
|
8:40
|
|
|
8:42
|
|
|
8:42
|
|
|
8:42
|
|
|
8:42
|
|
|
8:44
|
|
|
8:44
|
|
|
8:44
|
|
|
8:47
|
|
|
8:47
|
|
|
8:47
|
|
|
8:48
|
|
|
8:48
|
|
|
8:51
|
|
|
8:51
|
|
|
8:52
|
|
|
8:52
|
|
|
8:52
|
|
|
8:53
|
|
|
8:53
|
|
|
8:55
|
|
|
8:55
|
|
|
8:56
|
|
|
8:56
|
|
|
8:57
|
|
|
8:57
|
|
|
8:57
|
|
|
8:58
|
|
|
8:58
|
|
|
8:58
|
|
|
8:58
|
|
|
8:59
|
|
|
8:59
|
|
|
9:04
|
|
|
9:04
|
|
|
9:05
|
|
I am a 26 years old with autism and many attention-seeking behaviors. What causes them? I am verbal.
Today’s “Got Questions?” answer comes from Autism Speaks Chief Science Officer Geri Dawson, PhD
Thanks so much for your question. There are many reasons why a person with autism would engage in many attention seeking behaviors. Perhaps you would like to socially interact and make friends with others, but aren’t quite sure the best way to do this. If you are being ignored by others, this might lead you to repeat your attempts to interact again and again.
If you are engaging in a behavior that is ritualized (exactly the same each time) and repetitive, it might reflect a general tendency to engage in repetitive behaviors, which is a symptom of autism. With appropriate guidance, you can learn more appropriate ways of seeking attention and this will help you develop more satisfying relationships with others. Seeking the help of a psychologist or behavior analyst may be particularly beneficial.
For more information and resources, you can follow these links to our pages on Applied Behavioral Analysis, Adults with Autism and Adult Services.
Got more questions? Send them to GotQuestions@autismspeaks.org, and join Dr. Dawson for her next “Office Hours” webchat with co-host, Joe Horrigan, MD, Autism Speaks assistant vice president and head of medical research (first Thursday of every month at 3 pm Eastern).
Transcript of Today’s Office Hours Webchat
| Office Hours Webchat with Geri Dawson and Joe Horrigan Jan 5. Thanks to the more than 200 readers who joined us. As time allowed answering just a portion of more than 100 questions, we hope you’ll join us again next month—Feb. 2 (first Thursdays) at 3 pm Eastern. |
Thursday January 5, 2012
| 2:56 |
2:56 |
||
| 3:00 |
3:00 |
| 3:00 |
3:00 |
||
| 3:00 |
3:00 |
| 3:02 |
3:02 |
||
| 3:04 |
3:04 Guest |
| 3:05 |
3:05 |
||
| 3:07 |
3:07 Rachel |
| 3:09 |
3:09 |
||
| 3:09 |
3:09 Kim Smith |
| 3:10 |
3:10 |
||
| 3:12 |
3:12 Michele |
| 3:14 |
3:14 |
||
| 3:16 |
3:16 Guest |
| 3:18 |
3:18 |
||
| 3:20 |
3:20 Desi |
| 3:21 |
3:21 |
||
| 3:21 |
3:21 |
| 3:22 |
3:22 Lauren |
||
| 3:22 |
3:22 |
| 3:23 |
3:23 Guest |
||
| 3:23 |
3:23 |
| 3:26 |
3:26 Guest |
||
| 3:26 |
3:26 |
| 3:27 |
3:27 |
||
| 3:28 |
3:28 Guest |
| 3:30 |
3:30 |
||
| 3:32 |
3:32 lisa |
| 3:32 |
3:32 |
||
| 3:33 |
3:33 ann |
| 3:35 |
3:35 |
||
| 3:36 |
3:36 Michelle |
| 3:38 |
3:38 |
||
| 3:38 |
3:38 |
| 3:42 |
3:42 Aisha |
||
| 3:42 |
3:42 |
| 3:43 |
3:43 Lacey |
||
| 3:44 |
3:44 |
| 3:44 |
3:44 |
||
| 3:47 |
3:47 Courtney |
| 3:48 |
3:48 |
||
| 3:50 |
3:50 Robin |
| 3:50 |
3:50 |
||
| 3:51 |
3:51 |
| 3:52 |
3:52 |
||
| 3:53 |
3:53 JM |
| 3:55 |
3:55 Shannon |
||
| 3:56 |
3:56 Donna |
| 3:56 |
3:56 |
||
| 3:57 |
3:57 |
| 3:58 |
3:58 |
||
| 3:59 |
3:59 Suzanne B. |
| 3:59 |
3:59 |
||
| 4:02 |
4:02 Lisa |
| 4:03 |
4:03 |
||
| 4:03 |
4:03 Guest |
| 4:04 |
4:04 |
||
| 4:05 |
4:05 |
| 4:06 |
4:06 |
||
| 4:07 |
4:07 |
| 4:08 |
4:08 |
||
| 4:09 |
4:09 Michelle |
| 4:11 |
Thursday January 5, 2012 4:11 |
||
| 4:12 |
4:12 |
| 4:13 |
2 4:13 |
||
| 4:14 |
4:14 |
| 4:15 |
4:15 |
||
| 4:16 |
4:16 |
| 4:17 |
4:17 |
||
| 4:18 |
4:18 |
| 4:19 |
4:19 |
||
| 4:19 |
4:19 clair |
| 4:21 |
4:21 |
||
| 4:23 |
4:23 |
| 4:24 |
4:24 |
||
| 4:25 |
4:25 |
| 4:26 |
4:26 |
||
| 4:27 |
4:27 |
How does research help my child today?
Today’s “Got Questions?” reply comes from Rebecca Fehlig, Autism Speaks national director of field and chapter development
I still remember the day in 2009 when I was sitting in the committee hearing room of our state capitol. We were waiting for the next parent to testify in favor of our Autism Insurance Reform bill—in its second year of battle here in Missouri. Many moms and dads sat in the back with me, clutching their note cards, printed testimonials and handwritten pages. Though we were all nervous, we were eager to tell our stories to the legislators whose decision could make such a huge difference in our children’s lives.
Megan was a local volunteer, autism advocate and parent of two children, one of whom (Henry) has autism. Her hands were shaking a little, but she delivered her message in a calm and confident voice. She was confident the legislators would respond to her personal testimony. Megan explained that she was in extreme debt, had declared bankruptcy and had to sell her home—all to pay for Henry’s autism behavioral treatment. But Megan was not there to complain. She wanted to share Henry’s progress and positive outcomes. Thanks to more than 20 hours a week of early behavioral intervention, Henry had uttered his first words. She told the legislators that her financial sacrifices were well worth that precious reward. But she asked that other families not have to sell their homes and declare bankruptcy for their children to receive treatment for autism. I was not the only one wiping tears at the end of her story.
But the next individual who testified opposed our Autism Insurance Bill. He represented an insurance provider, and he used the same argument that insurance lobbyists were feeding the legislators across the country. “Although we empathize with Megan’s struggle,” he said, “the simple fact is that behavioral therapy is an experimental treatment for autism.” He said it was reckless for insurance providers to pay for experimental therapies and that despite Henry’s improvement, there was no predicting whether other children would benefit.
His words produced gasps around the room. My heart sank.
But wait, this is where the story gets good. Next, Lorri Unumb, Autism Speaks vice president for state government affairs, took the stand. She too shared the progress of her son from intensive applied behavioral analysis (ABA). But it was the next part of her testimonial that every legislator in the room heard loud and clear.
Countering the insurance industry testimony head-on, Lorri stated unequivocally, “ABA is not experimental!” And she had the published research studies to back up her statement.
It didn’t matter whether the studies were done in Missouri or another state. Each study had been vetted and published by a leading scientific journal. The evidence made clear that ABA is far from experimental, and it demonstrated the importance of early intervention in producing the most successful outcomes.
The Missouri House of Representatives voted our bill out of committee that day. It went on to our governor’s desk to be signed into law—all because we had the scientific research to back up our efforts.
Never before had the importance of funding research become so clear to me!
Currently Autism Speaks is funding additional studies that can provide a firm foundation for our advocating that insurers cover additional types of behavioral therapy–such as social skills training, infant-toddler interventions and cognitive behavioral therapies focused on social and communication skills.
And that’s crucial because the downside to our story was that the Missouri bill mandated coverage for some but not all autism treatments. Many more treatment options need to be further investigated to ensure they are safe and produce tangible benefits for those who struggle with autism.
The great news is that Autism Speaks just funded $1.8 million in treatment grants that will further our understanding of the most promising new interventions—not only for children but for all those on the spectrum—from early intervention therapies in underserved communities to job interview training for adults.
We look to these studies to give us the ammunition we’ll need the next time we are sitting in front of a room full of government decision makers. And they would not be possible without your support at our Walks and other fundraisers.
When it comes to helping our children and all those with autism, scientific evidence of benefit puts us on the road to affordable access to therapy. And that means better outcomes. This is what our families deserve and our mission supports.
Autism Speaks continues to work for state-mandated medical coverage for autism interventions. To date, its advocacy efforts have helped secure autism insurance reform laws in 29 states. To learn more about Autism Speaks advocacy efforts, please visit http://www.autismvotes.org.
For more news and perspective, please visit the Autism Speaks science page.
Fourth Annual World Focus on Autism
(Back, L to R) Mr. Hassan Ali Bin Ali – Qatar, Mrs. Emine Erdoğan – Turkey, Mme. Raymonde Goudou Coffie – Côte d’Ivoire, Mrs. Valeria Toribiong – Palau, Dr. Pentti Arajärvi – Finland, Mrs. Barbara Miklič Türk – Slovenia, Mrs. Sandra Thomas – Grenada, Dr. Liri Berisha – Albania, Mrs. Natalia Gryshchenko – Ukraine, Mrs. Eloise Gonsalves – Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Prof. Saima Wazed Hossain – Bangladesh, Dr. Cecelia McCarton – The McCarton School, Mme. Ilham Hussain – Maldives, Mrs. Elsie Christofia – Cyprus, Mrs. Rosella Nestor King – Saint Lucia, Ms. Sue Herera – CNBC (Front, L to R) Mrs. Penehuipifo Pohama – Namibia, Mrs. Sarah Wescot-Williams – Saint Martin, Mrs. Shiranthi Rajapaksa – Sri Lanka, Mrs. Ban Soo-taek – Wife of the Secretary General of the UN, Mrs. Suzanne Wright – Autism Speaks, Mrs. Lorna Golding – Jamaica, Dr. Patience Faka Jonathan – Nigeria, Mrs. Hannah Jurelang Zedkaia – Marshall Islands, Mrs. Ingrid Bouterese – Suriname
For the fourth year in a row Autism Speaks brought together first spouses and esteemed dignitaries, including ministers of health, from more than 30 countries around the globe for the Fourth Annual World Focus on Autism. The event, held on Tuesday, September 20, 2011, was part of an ongoing effort to raise global awareness and share best practices for countries, communities and families struggling with this non-discriminative disorder.
Mrs. Ban Soon-taek, wife of the U.N. Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, in her fourth year of attendance joined event hosts Suzanne and Bob Wright of Autism Speaks. Additional distinguished guests included event Co-host Dr. Cecelia McCarton, executive director and founder of The McCarton Foundation and the McCarton School, and emcee Sue Herera of CNBC’s “Power Lunch.”
Attendees convened at The McCarton School, which provides an educational program for children with autism by using an integrated one-to-one model of therapy grounded in Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) combined with speech and language therapy, motor skills training and peer interaction. “This school has given so much to our children with autism, and we wanted each of you to experience it firsthand today,” said Suzanne Wright. “It’s here under this roof that the meticulous work to connect with our children with autism takes place.”
United in a global cause, a record number of dignitaries attended, including the first spouses of Albania, the Republic of Cyprus, Finland, Grenada, Jamaica, the Republic of the Maldives, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Namibia, Nigeria, the Republic of Palau, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, and Turkey.
Guests toured the school and met with students, who made glass bead necklaces for the visiting first spouses. Later, the dignitaries assembled to learn about Autism Speaks’ global initiatives – including the annual World Autism Awareness Day celebrated on April 2 and Autism Speaks’ Light it Up Blue campaign; as well as Autism Speaks’ Global Autism Public Health (GAPH) initiative. GAPH initiatives championed by individual countries, as well as regional efforts including the South-East European Autism Network (SEAN) and the South Asian Autism Network (SAAN) were highlighted during the event.
In her opening remarks, Mrs. Ban Soon-taek welcomed the international group on behalf of her husband U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stating, “autism touches so many in the world, no matter where they live, no matter how much money they have, no matter their religion, no matter their gender. And like a pebble in a pond, the effects of autism ripple outward to parents, siblings, and caregivers. Autism is at once deeply personal and truly global.”
Speakers at the event included distinguished guests Dr. Liri Berisha, spouse of the Prime Minister of Albania; Dr. Ante Zvonimir Golem, Croatia’s State Secretary for Health and Social Welfare; Professor Saima Wazed Hossain, daughter of the Prime Minister of Bangladesh; and Professor A.F.M. Ruhal Haque, MP, F.R.C.S, Bangladesh’s Minister of Health and Family Welfare; as well as Autism Speaks Vice President of Scientific Affairs Dr. Andy Shih. Each speaker offered remarks on the significance of fostering global partnerships in combating the global public health crisis of autism.
| = |
‘World’s First Ladies Take on Autism’ in the The Wall Street Journal.
Sound Bites – Autism Tidbits from IMFAR 2011
This is a guest blog post from Autism Speaks Science Board member John Elder Robison, author of Look Me in the Eye: My Life with Asperger’s and Be Different: Adventured of a Free-Range Aspergian.
There is a lot of talk about the need for therapies for adults with autism. A review of emerging adolescent therapies suggests that many can be applied to adults with minimal adaption. Testing/validating of what we have will be a lot less costly than developing something new.
Stem cell research may ultimately hold a key to autism, as we learn to grow brain sections of mice in the lab. That skill may translate to humans within a decade.
More and more, scientists agree that autism is the result of genetic predisposition and a trigger. Many hoped the “trigger” was a simple chemical like mercury, but we are realizing there are both environmental and disease triggers. Unfortunately, knowing they are there does not make them any easier to find. Identifying pathways into autism for a large part of our population remains an elusive goal.
One of the things that pleased me most at this year’s IMFAR conference was the way that advocates and journalists are finally coming together and finding common ground. “As Thinking Person’s Guide to Autism” editor Shannon Rosa said, science doesn’t have a hidden agenda…
This year’s Autism Speaks “Autism Connects” technology competition drew over 130
technical and engineering students to develop tools to help people with communication disabilities. For me, the most important take-away was not the entries themselves but the realization that we have so much to gain by drawing technical people from other fields, like industrial design and computer science into autism research.
For some time we have known that that therapies like ABA teach behaviors, not feelings. For example, we (autistic people) can learn to read a face and realize, “he’s happy,” but that logical knowledge does not often translate to us experiencing the feeling. At this year’s IMFAR Susan Bookheimer of UCLA spent quite a bit of time showing me what imaging studies are teaching us about how we may soon help autistic people feel that happy message and thereby feel happy themselves. That will represent a quantum leap in the power and effectiveness of therapy.
I’ve heard comments about “the rolling walk of autistic people” before. This year I saw results of a study from the University of Fairfield that actually quantified differences in gaits between autistic and NT people. Why do we walk in a sawtooth pattern where NT people walk in a straight line? The researcher had some ideas, but why remains a mystery.
For years people have looked at nonverbal people (autistic or otherwise) and wondered… what’s going inside their brains? If a person can’t talk, they can’t take a conventional IQ test, and rightly or wrongly, many have been presumed intellectually disabled for lack of evidence to the contrary. Today, researchers are using both high precision EEG and fMRI imaging to measure brain patterns in response to stimuli. For example, when a person sees a cat and hears the word cat there is one characteristic pattern of activity. When the person sees a cat and hears dog, the mismatch causes a different activation. We can measure those responses, even in people who don’t talk, and thereby gain insight into how much they are perceiving and thinking, and how fast. Understanding is the precursor to therapy.
This year many scientists who have family members on the spectrum proudly wore
stakeholder ribbons on their name tags. At the stakeholder lunch, we discussed the balance between funding community services and funding science. Without science, all we have to care for the disabled is faith and compassion. The addition of science-based medicine is what’s taken us from life in the Middle Ages to where we are today. Science provides the foundation to make community and family services work better. That’s why we need it.
When I spoke at the luncheon yesterday, I reminded people that we are all sitting here in safety, but in the middle of our country, one hundred million pounds of water are flowing past Red River Landing on the Mississippi River every single second, and the rate is rising still. That flood could cause the loss of the Old River Control Structure, which is what keeps the Mississippi from changing course and flowing to the Gulf at Morgan City instead of New Orleans. If that happens as a result of this historic flood (already greater than any we’ve seen in 80 years) our country could be facing the worst natural disaster in its history.
If you’re a praying person, now is the time to pray for all those people in the Mississippi floodplain. As much as I believe in science and engineering, if I had to lay money on the Army Corp of Engineers or Nature, I’d have to choose nature.
Why Nature? In the world of autism, the brain nature has given us provides the most complex puzzle man has ever attempted to solve. Out on the river, this flood shows once again how all our science and technology sometimes fades to insignificance before the natural world. Yet we go forward with faith that science will bring us the solutions we need, both on the river and in our heads.
On a personal note, I was pleased to see grad students and researchers whose work I have supported through my participation in review boards bringing the fruits of their work to IMFAR. It made me feel like I had a small part in the collective success of our group, and that feels good.
I was also thrilled to see that Alex Plank (a young man with Asperger’s) was filming the conference and he’ll be sharing it soon on the Autism Speaks and Wrong Planet websites, and elsewhere.
In closing I’d like to thank all the friends I’ve made in this community, and also the folks at INSAR and Autism Speaks, who made it possible for me to attend this conference. I’ll see you next year in Toronto!
Woof!
In Memoriam: Dr. O. Ivar Lovaas (1927-2010)
Editor’s note: On August 2, 2010, Dr. O. Ivar Lovaas passed away. We sincerely thank Dr. Lovaas for all of his contributions to the autism community.
In 1981, with the publication of Dr. Lovaas’ pioneering work, Teaching Developmentally Disabled Children (popularly known as “The ME Book”), the landscape of the world of autism was quite different than it is today. In 1981, the prevalence of autism in the general population was reported to be only 4 in 10,000, hardly the 1 in 100 world epidemic that autism represents today. While considered a relative rarity at the time, a diagnosis of autism in the 1960’s and 1970’s was considered by most to be the beginning of a countdown to institutional care. To add insult to injury, Bruno Bettelheim and others were disseminating and perpetuating the notion that autism was caused by cold and unfeeling “refrigerator mothers” and other forms of inadequate parenting. For much of the latter part of the last century, families of children with autism had little, if anything, to hope for.
Dr. Lovaas, who had already been working with children with autism for decades, knew better. Dr. Lovaas knew instinctively that poor parenting was not to blame. However, finding the root cause of autism was not Dr. Lovaas’ chosen mission. Instead, Dr. Lovaas focused his energy and attention on developing effective teaching strategies. Dr. Lovaas believed that children with autism could “learn to learn.” Back in the day, this was considered by many to be an unreachable star.
Just as Thomas Edison’s numerous lightbulb failures paved the way for Edison’s ultimate success, Dr. Lovaas painstakingly identified the “serious mistakes” that he and his colleagues at UCLA had made over the course of two decades in attempting to teach children with autism and other severe developmental disabilities. Dr. Lovaas knew that the first step to finding an effective, core intervention would be to identify and eliminate the various approaches and strategies that had been tried, but which were demonstrably ineffective. Dr. Lovaas then worked tirelessly to break down the large and general problem of “disability” into manageable and separate behavioral units. Through years of trials, Dr. Lovaas further refined his behavior modification techniques and approaches. Over time, Dr. Lovaas’ work in the field became recognized to the point that for many, “Lovaas” became synonomous with the term “Applied Behavior Analysis.”
During the 1980’s, Dr. Lovaas and his colleagues at the UCLA Young Autism Project further refined their behavioral approaches, and they were fortunate enough to receive an important grant from the NIH allowing a most unusual and intensive approach that had never before been attempted—a forty hour per week one-to-one teaching program. In 1987, the results of Dr. Lovaas’ study, entitled Behavioral Treatment and Normal Educational and Intellectual Functioning in Young Autistic Children, were published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, a respected peer review journal.
While there certainly was some controversy over the precise “design” of Dr. Lovaas’ study, there had never before been a study reporting such a favorable outcome—many of the students who had been receiving a 40 hour per week intervention program for approximately 2-3 years had recovered function to the point that they were considered virtually indistinguishable from their typically developing peers. A 1993 follow-up study appearing in the American Journal on Mental Retardation confirmed that some six years later, all but one of the children in the “best outcome” group had retained the gains reported in the 1987 study. In 1998, the Surgeon General’s Report on Autism referred to Dr. Lovaas’ 1987 study as a “well designed study” that “….demonstrated the efficacy of applied behavioral methods [ABA] in reducing inappropriate behavior and in increasing communication.” Vindication!
In 2002, Dr. Lovaas asked me to write a chapter on ABA litigation for his then upcoming update to The ME Book, Teaching Individuals With Developmental Delays (Pro-Ed). Dr. Lovaas told me in the charming Norwegian accent that he never seemed to lose despite living in this country for many decades that his greatest wish was that every parent, whether residing in California, New York or Alaska, would have access to effective autism treatments. Dr. Lovaas regularly spoke of the need for insurance reform, as he knew full well the devastating impact autism can have upon the family. The dedication appearing in Dr. Lovaas’ latest book speaks volumes as to his empathy and compassion for the family: “This manual is dedicated to all parents of children with developmental delays in recognition of the heavy burdens they carry, and the models they provide for all parents to follow.”
I last sat with Dr. Lovaas and his lovely wife, Nina, at the Autism Speaks’ benefit concert in Los Angeles, headlined by Paul Simon and Jerry Seinfeld. Dr. Lovaas was truly pleased to see how far public awareness of autism had come. He also has a special appreciation for Jerry Seinfeld’s jokes, ostensibly because so many of them are based on the nuances of human behavior.
Dr. Lovaas’ pioneering work has not only helped, but has profoundly changed the lives and futures of thousands of affected children and their families. Dr. Lovaas’ work continues to have a profound impact on the professional development of today’s autism professionals. Perhaps most importantly, where once there was darkness, Dr. Lovaas brought light and genuine hope.
The autism community clearly has lost a giant.
This guest post is by Gary Mayerson. He serves on the board of Autism Speaks and is the founder of Mayerson & Associates, the first law firm in the nation dedicated to representing children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders.
How Becoming a Therapist Changed My Life
This is a guest post by Emily Mandel. Emily is a student at Brandeis University who is training in ABA therapy.
This summer I am interning at a center called Greenwich Education and Prep in Cos Cob, Connecticut, learning to be a therapist for children with autism using Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) under the supervision of Dr. Mindy Rothstein and her colleagues. Initially, ABA was what I expected it to be: a therapy involving reinforcement of positive solicited behaviors. “Alex, look at me… Alex… Alex, what do you have to say? Say it to my face. Very good! You earn a point toward winning your candy.” However, until I began this training, I had not realized how multi-faceted and complicated ABA is. I had assumed it was the same method of therapy for every child, and that if it did not work it was not the right therapy for the child. What I’ve been observing, however, is quite contrary to my expectations.
Each child has a unique program designed to address the specific preferences, strengths, and areas of challenge. For example, if a child has trouble with eye contact and following directions, the instructor will reinforce eye contact and direction-following with prizes the student can earn after obtaining a certain number of “points.” In addition, the instructor prepares various activities to address each of the areas of difficulty, and monitors the progress made in each activity. For example, that same child with difficulty making eye contact and following directions is given a task like a puzzle and prompted to make eye contact each time a direction is given regarding the puzzle.
Over my summer so far, I’ve seen such changes in the children. I am pleased to see how far each child has progressed using ABA intervention techniques.. Most times forms of therapy– including ABA –benefit from the accompaniment of other forms of therapy. However, I’ve come to believe that ABA is fundamental; the ABA program targets each specific area of challenge for the child. I cannot wait to see how the children I am working with progress over the course of the rest of the summer, and how they will continue to progress throughout their lives.
I’ve made the decision to go through the certification process for Applied Behavior Analysis after I earn my Bachelor’s Degree in Psychology from Brandeis University. Greenwich Education and Prep has truly shown me the cognitive leaps and bounds children with autism can make. I hope to one day be able to change the lives of these children and their families through this fundamental method of therapy. I’ve seen what ABA can achieve, and I know that this is what I want to do with my life.
My Five-Year-Old Child Does Not Talk … Will He Ever?
This guest post is by Connie Kasari, Ph.D., a Professor of Education and Psychiatry and the Center for Autism Research at UCLA.
This is the question and the worry for a quarter to about half of all parents of children with autism. Research studies tell us that children who can talk by the time they turn five years old have better outcomes. But is this age marker meaningful, and what does it mean exactly?
The extraordinary success of early intervention programs has been shrinking the numbers of children who remain nonverbal. Still many children develop slowly, becoming late speakers if at all. What do we know that helps these children?
Late speaking children were the subject of a recent review paper, which was selected as one of Autism Speaks’ Top 10 Scientific Achievements in 2009 (Pickett, Pullara, O’Grady & Gordon, 2009). The authors found 64 studies involving 167 children who learned to speak after age five. Several important observations were noted. First, the authors found that while most children who learned to speak were between five and seven years some children learned to speak for the first time at age 13 years! The majority of children learned single words, but some were able to speak in sentences. Finally, the numbers they report are probably an underestimate of actual cases since researchers often exclude children who are nonverbal, or under-report late speaking children. Therefore, it may be harder to learn to speak after age five, but it is clearly not impossible.
What types of interventions are helping children to speak? Several approaches look promising. Both behavioral interventions and ones using augmentative and alternative communication devices (AAC) seem to work. AAC approaches (examples include PECS, sign language and speech generating devices) do not seem to inhibit the development of spoken language (Schlosser & Wendt, 2008); however, for many children the use of AAC allows them to become communicators without reliance on spoken language. Thus, AAC interventions need to be adopted more often and studied.
Applied behavior analysis (ABA) is the most common approach to teaching children with autism; however, the results of intensive training have not always improved spoken language. A promising hybrid behavioral and developmental intervention focuses on ‘joint attention’, nonverbal gestures that develop before children learn to speak with words, and involve the sharing of attention between a person and an object or event. Preschool aged children who received a joint attention intervention made greater language gains than children receiving traditional applied behavior analysis interventions (Kasari et al, 2008) but it is not clear if similar interventions will work with older children.
At UCLA we are beginning to test out whether a joint attention intervention will be effective for children who are nonverbal and older than five years. The study is an Autism Speaks funded High Risk, High Impact study for Characterizing Cognition in Nonverbal Individuals with Autism (CCNIA). This multi-site study involves researchers from UCLA, (Connie Kasari) Kennedy Kreiger Institute (Rebecca Landa) and Vanderbilt University (Ann Kaiser). We are comparing our joint attention intervention with a focus on spoken language (using Enhanced Milieu Training; Kaiser, Hancock & Nietfeld, 2000) to an intervention involving the use of a speech -generating device. A unique aspect of this study is the use of an alternating treatment design, recognizing that children may need a sequence of treatments for best response, or may respond better with one treatment versus another. This design is called a SMART design (sequential multiple assignment randomization trial –SMART; Murphy, 2005). Our goal is to determine the most effective intervention for increasing communication competence of children who are nonverbal, recognizing the variability in characteristics of these children, and the individualized nature of their response to treatment.
So the good news is that language development CAN progress after age five, but stay tuned for more research!
Kaiser, A. P., Hancock, T. B., & Nietfeld, J. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Journal of Early Education and Development [Special Issue], 11(4), 423-446.
Kasari, C., Paparella, T, Freeman, S.N., & Jahromi, L (2008). Language outcome in autism: Randomized comparison of joint attention and play interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 125-137.
Murphy SA. (2005) An Experimental Design for the Development of Adaptive Treatment Strategies. Statistics in Medicine. 24:1455-1481.
Pickett, E., Pullara, O, O’Grady, J., & Gordon, B. (2009). Speech acquisition in older nonverbal individuals with autism: A review of features, methods and prognosis. Cognitive Behavior Neurology, 22 1-21.
Schlosser, RW, & Wendt O (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology • Vol. 17 • 212–230.










